Actor Rajkummar Rao appeared before a Jalandhar JMIC court on July 28 in connection with a 2017 FIR over a film poster from Behen Hogi Teri. The poster depicted him as Lord Shiva sitting on a motorbike, which led to outrage and legal action. The court granted conditional bail in the Rajkummar Rao religious sentiments case.
Why Rajkummar Rao faced court in religious sentiments case
His advocate, Darshan Singh Dayal, stated that the actor didn’t receive earlier summons due to address changes. The FIR included charges under IPC Sections 295A, 120B, and IT Act Section 67. Dayal said the portrayal was artistic, not offensive, and aligned with Rao’s film role. The poster scene had CBFC clearance, and Dayal cited Article 19(1)(a) on freedom of expression.
Public reaction to Case
The case has reignited debates on how religious symbols are used in Indian cinema. Some support Rao’s artistic freedom; others stress cultural sensitivity. The case remains active, with further hearings and police reports pending in the Rajkummar Rao religious sentiments case.
Also Read: Kangana Ranaut defamation case: High Court Rejects Plea To Quash Bathinda Trial
FAQs
Q1: What was the case against Rajkummar Rao about?
A: It involved a 2017 poster from Behen Hogi Teri, where he dressed as Lord Shiva, allegedly hurting sentiments.
Q2: Did Rajkummar Rao get bail?
A: Yes, he surrendered in Jalandhar and was granted conditional bail.
Q3: What charges were filed?
A: IPC 295A (religious hurt), 120B (conspiracy), and IT Act Section 67.Q4: What was the court’s take?
A: The court accepted his surrender, granted bail, and scheduled further proceedings.
